text

Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation

SOAR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Louda, Svata M.
dc.contributor.author Arnett, Amy E.
dc.contributor.author Rand, Tatyana A.
dc.contributor.author Russell, F. Leland
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-26T19:45:56Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-26T19:45:56Z
dc.date.issued 2003-02-23
dc.identifier.citation Louda, Svata M., Arnett, Amy E., Rand, Tatyana A. and F. L. Russell. 2003. Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Conservation Biology , Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.73–82. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02020.x en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0888-8892
dc.identifier.uri http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02020.x/pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10057/3693
dc.description This is the author's version of the article. The final publication is available at the publisher's website. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02020.x en_US
dc.description.abstract The problem of invasive species has reignited interest in biological control as a management tool.Classical biological control involves deliberate release of exotic natural enemies into new environments in an attempt to limit the density of an invasive species. Persistent, sustained limitation of invasive species by coevolved natural enemies is a seductive concept. Evidence now suggests, however, that biological control through the release of natural enemies can carry unanticipated ecological risks. There have been ecological side effects of distributing a deliberately introduced weevil ( Rhinocyllus conicus) and an adventitious weevil ( Larinus planus) for the biological control of exotic thistles. Both weevils have had major direct effects on key population-growth parameters of native thistles, and R. conicus has had an indirect effect on the interaction between a thistle and a native insect. These findings led us to review how ecological risk is evaluated, and to ask whether pre-release tests can predict the types of ecological effects documented. We conclude that, when done thoroughly, the tests used can determine host specificity by identifying physiological host range, but the usual tests cannot be relied upon to predict the ecological host range or impact on populations of less-preferred but accepted native species. Our data provide support for suggestions that the behavioral and developmental data now taken need to be supplemented with additional data on population parameters to better predict field-host use, population growth, interaction strengths, and ecological outcomes for native species that are potential hosts. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Society for Conservation Biology en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Conservation Biology;v.17, no.1
dc.title Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Peer reviewed article

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SOAR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics