Are within-subjects designs transparent?

dc.contributor.advisor	Shaffer, Victoria A.
dc.contributor.author	Lambdin, Charles Garett	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2010-05-03T18:38:28Z
dc.date.available	2010-05-03T18:38:28Z
dc.date.issued	2009-05	en_US
dc.identifier.other	d09008	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368
dc.description	Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Psychology	en_US
dc.description.abstract	In the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of four between-subjects JDM experiments was empirically tested. None of the replications were found to be transparent, and further, transparency did not in any way affect the success or failure of the replications. It was also found that members of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making were not able to predict how transparent tasks would be when presented within subjects, suggesting that researchers have no special insight into what will or will not prove transparent to participants.	en_US
dc.format.extent	x, 168 p.	en_US
dc.format.extent	2289317 bytes
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	Wichita State University	en_US
dc.title	Are within-subjects designs transparent?	en_US
dc.type	Dissertation	en_US

Files in this item

Name: DISSER2009SPRING_8.pdf

Size: 2.183Mb

Format: application/ pdf

Description: Dissertation

Dissertations [245]
This collection includes Ph.D. dissertations completed at the Wichita State University Graduate School.
LAS Theses and Dissertations [379]
Theses and dissertations completed at the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Fall 2005 -)
PSY Theses and Dissertations [78]
This collection consists of theses and dissertations completed at the WSU Department of Psychology.