text

Validity of field measurements for body composition

SOAR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ziegler, Bryan Michael
dc.contributor.author Fetters, Leighton
dc.contributor.author Patterson, Jeremy A.
dc.date.accessioned 2008-06-04T15:33:35Z
dc.date.available 2008-06-04T15:33:35Z
dc.date.issued 2008-04-25
dc.identifier.citation Ziegler, Bryan, Fetters, Leighton , Patterson, Jeremy (2008). .Validity of field measurements for body composition . In Proceedings: 4th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p.25-26 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1341
dc.description Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008. en
dc.description Research completed at the Department of Human Performance Studies, College of Education en
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This study was designed to test the validity of four field measurements for body composition against the standard laboratory measurement. Methods: Six participants were recruited from KSS 860 Research Methods in the Profession (2 male, 4 female). Participants were measured for % body fat by five methods: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skin-fold calipers (SKF), anthropometric measurements (ANT), and Tanita bioelectrical impedence scale (athlete mode =BIA; non-athlete mode = BINA). Field measurements were recorded in duplicate staggered by 7 days. All field measurements were recorded by an experienced technician. DXA values were recorded within the same week as the first set of field measurements. Mean values for each field test were calculated and used to asses validity compared to DXA. Validity of each field test was assessed using bi-variate Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results: This study found that the anthropometric equations for measuring % body fat yielded valid results when compared to DXA (r = 0.963, p<0.01). In contrast, SKF, BIA, and BINA did not yield valid results for measuring % body fat when compared to DXA (r = 0.798, p = 0.057; r = 0.712, p = 0.177; r = 0.702, p = 0.187). Conclusion: Anthropometric measurements have been shown to yield valid results when used to quantify percent body fat in field settings. The use of skinfold calipers, and the Tanita bioelectrical impedance scale should be avoided as the results are not valid when compared to the laboratory standard. en
dc.format.extent 152852 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Wichita State University. Graduate School. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries GRASP en
dc.relation.ispartofseries v.4 en
dc.title Validity of field measurements for body composition en
dc.type Conference paper en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SOAR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics